{ "$schema": "https://ar-tik.com/data/schemas/courses-catalog.schema.json", "generatedAt": "2026-07-02", "publisher": "Artik Lab s.r.l.", "canonicalDomain": "https://ar-tik.com", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "catalog": { "title": "Corporate AI courses: choose the right path", "description": "Corporate AI course catalog: introductory, managerial, operational and technical paths designed with DTR around roles, workflows and expected outcomes.", "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index-dossier.md" } }, "courses": [ { "id": "workflow-redesign", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "foundation", "familyLabel": "Foundation", "featured": true, "title": "AI Workflow Redesign Lab", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to workflow redesign, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to workflow redesign, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "8 hours, configurable as 2 or 4 sessions", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "all", "profileDescription": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach workflow redesign through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on workflow redesign and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on workflow redesign and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Map the real work", "description": "Activities, decisions, information handoffs and bottlenecks." }, { "title": "Assess AI potential", "description": "Impact, feasibility, risk, data quality and control level." }, { "title": "Redesign the workflow", "description": "Roles, inputs, outputs, reviews, escalation and traceability." }, { "title": "Move into adoption", "description": "Metrics, minimum governance, roadmap and operating ownership." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to workflow redesign.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for workflow redesign.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for workflow redesign.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on workflow redesign", "practical training for AI Workflow Redesign Lab", "AI training for company workflows", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for workflow redesign", "how to introduce workflow redesign into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "workflow redesign is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to workflow redesign absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for workflow redesign." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on workflow redesign, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for workflow redesign." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether workflow redesign deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns workflow redesign, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Use it as the starting point when it is not yet clear which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "managing-ai", "ai-literacy", "ai-governance", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/workflow-redesign.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/workflow-redesign.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/workflow-redesign-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/workflow-redesign.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "managing-ai", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "managerial", "familyLabel": "Managerial", "featured": false, "title": "Managing AI", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to managerial AI adoption, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to managerial AI adoption, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4 hours, two 2-hour sessions", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "mixed", "profileDescription": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach managerial AI adoption through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on managerial AI adoption and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on managerial AI adoption and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Shared understanding", "description": "Capabilities, limits, responsibilities and business implications." }, { "title": "Use-case evaluation", "description": "Value, feasibility, risk, data and ownership." }, { "title": "Governance and quality", "description": "Rules, review, escalation and accountable decisions." }, { "title": "Adoption roadmap", "description": "Priorities, skills, metrics and next steps." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to managerial AI adoption.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for managerial AI adoption.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for managerial AI adoption.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on managerial AI adoption", "practical training for Managing AI", "AI training for managers and business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for managerial AI adoption", "how to introduce managerial AI adoption into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "managerial AI adoption is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to managerial AI adoption absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for managerial AI adoption." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on managerial AI adoption, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for managerial AI adoption." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether managerial AI adoption deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns managerial AI adoption, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "ai-governance", "ai-adoption-manager", "ai-business-case-roi" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/managing-ai.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/managing-ai.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/managing-ai-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/managing-ai.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "managing-ai-general", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "managerial", "familyLabel": "Managerial", "featured": false, "title": "Managing AI for mixed company teams", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to cross-functional AI alignment, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to cross-functional AI alignment, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4 hours, two 2-hour sessions", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "mixed", "profileDescription": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach cross-functional AI alignment through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on cross-functional AI alignment and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on cross-functional AI alignment and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Shared understanding", "description": "Capabilities, limits, responsibilities and business implications." }, { "title": "Use-case evaluation", "description": "Value, feasibility, risk, data and ownership." }, { "title": "Governance and quality", "description": "Rules, review, escalation and accountable decisions." }, { "title": "Adoption roadmap", "description": "Priorities, skills, metrics and next steps." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to cross-functional AI alignment.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for cross-functional AI alignment.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for cross-functional AI alignment.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on cross-functional AI alignment", "practical training for Managing AI for mixed company teams", "AI training for managers and business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for cross-functional AI alignment", "how to introduce cross-functional AI alignment into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "cross-functional AI alignment is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to cross-functional AI alignment absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for cross-functional AI alignment." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on cross-functional AI alignment, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for cross-functional AI alignment." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether cross-functional AI alignment deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns cross-functional AI alignment, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "ai-governance", "ai-adoption-manager", "ai-business-case-roi" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/managing-ai-general.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/managing-ai-general.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/managing-ai-general-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/managing-ai-general.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-governance", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "managerial", "familyLabel": "Managerial", "featured": false, "title": "Operational AI Governance", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to operational AI governance, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to operational AI governance, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4 hours, two 2-hour sessions", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "mixed", "profileDescription": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach operational AI governance through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on operational AI governance and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on operational AI governance and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Shared understanding", "description": "Capabilities, limits, responsibilities and business implications." }, { "title": "Use-case evaluation", "description": "Value, feasibility, risk, data and ownership." }, { "title": "Governance and quality", "description": "Rules, review, escalation and accountable decisions." }, { "title": "Adoption roadmap", "description": "Priorities, skills, metrics and next steps." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to operational AI governance.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for operational AI governance.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for operational AI governance.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on operational AI governance", "practical training for Operational AI Governance", "AI training for managers and business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for operational AI governance", "how to introduce operational AI governance into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "operational AI governance is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to operational AI governance absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for operational AI governance." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on operational AI governance, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for operational AI governance." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether operational AI governance deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns operational AI governance, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "ai-adoption-manager", "ai-business-case-roi" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-governance.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-governance.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-governance-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-governance.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-business-case-roi", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "managerial", "familyLabel": "Managerial", "featured": false, "title": "AI Business Case & ROI Sprint", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to AI business cases and ROI, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to AI business cases and ROI, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4 hours or a half-day sprint", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "mixed", "profileDescription": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach AI business cases and ROI through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on AI business cases and ROI and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on AI business cases and ROI and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Shared understanding", "description": "Capabilities, limits, responsibilities and business implications." }, { "title": "Use-case evaluation", "description": "Value, feasibility, risk, data and ownership." }, { "title": "Governance and quality", "description": "Rules, review, escalation and accountable decisions." }, { "title": "Adoption roadmap", "description": "Priorities, skills, metrics and next steps." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to AI business cases and ROI.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for AI business cases and ROI.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for AI business cases and ROI.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on AI business cases and ROI", "practical training for AI Business Case & ROI Sprint", "AI training for managers and business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for AI business cases and ROI", "how to introduce AI business cases and ROI into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "AI business cases and ROI is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to AI business cases and ROI absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for AI business cases and ROI." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on AI business cases and ROI, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for AI business cases and ROI." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether AI business cases and ROI deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns AI business cases and ROI, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "ai-governance", "ai-adoption-manager" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-business-case-roi.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-business-case-roi.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-business-case-roi-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-business-case-roi.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-adoption-manager", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "managerial", "familyLabel": "Managerial", "featured": false, "title": "AI Adoption Manager / AI Champions", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to AI adoption champions, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to AI adoption champions, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "6-8 hours, configurable", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "all", "profileDescription": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach AI adoption champions through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on AI adoption champions and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on AI adoption champions and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Shared understanding", "description": "Capabilities, limits, responsibilities and business implications." }, { "title": "Use-case evaluation", "description": "Value, feasibility, risk, data and ownership." }, { "title": "Governance and quality", "description": "Rules, review, escalation and accountable decisions." }, { "title": "Adoption roadmap", "description": "Priorities, skills, metrics and next steps." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to AI adoption champions.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for AI adoption champions.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for AI adoption champions.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on AI adoption champions", "practical training for AI Adoption Manager / AI Champions", "AI training for managers and business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for AI adoption champions", "how to introduce AI adoption champions into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "AI adoption champions is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to AI adoption champions absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for AI adoption champions." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on AI adoption champions, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for AI adoption champions." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether AI adoption champions deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns AI adoption champions, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "ai-governance", "ai-business-case-roi" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-adoption-manager.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-adoption-manager.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-adoption-manager-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-adoption-manager.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-literacy", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "managerial", "familyLabel": "Managerial", "featured": false, "title": "Role-Based AI Literacy & Responsible Use", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to role-based AI literacy, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to role-based AI literacy, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4-8 hours, adaptable by role", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "all", "profileDescription": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach role-based AI literacy through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on role-based AI literacy and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on role-based AI literacy and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Shared understanding", "description": "Capabilities, limits, responsibilities and business implications." }, { "title": "Use-case evaluation", "description": "Value, feasibility, risk, data and ownership." }, { "title": "Governance and quality", "description": "Rules, review, escalation and accountable decisions." }, { "title": "Adoption roadmap", "description": "Priorities, skills, metrics and next steps." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to role-based AI literacy.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for role-based AI literacy.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for role-based AI literacy.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on role-based AI literacy", "practical training for Role-Based AI Literacy & Responsible Use", "AI training for managers and business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for role-based AI literacy", "how to introduce role-based AI literacy into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "role-based AI literacy is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to role-based AI literacy absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for role-based AI literacy." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on role-based AI literacy, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for role-based AI literacy." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether role-based AI literacy deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns role-based AI literacy, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "ai-governance", "ai-adoption-manager", "ai-business-case-roi" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-literacy.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-literacy.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-literacy-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-literacy.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-documenti", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "intro", "familyLabel": "Introductory", "featured": false, "title": "AI course: managing documents with AI", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to document management, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to document management, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "8 hours, customisable", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "all", "profileDescription": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach document management through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on document management and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on document management and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Work context", "description": "Documents, channels, tasks and recurring decisions." }, { "title": "Practical AI use", "description": "Instructions, examples, review criteria and limits." }, { "title": "Reusable workflow", "description": "Templates, checklists, handoffs and controls." }, { "title": "Safe adoption", "description": "Data, privacy, quality and next steps." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to document management.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for document management.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for document management.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on document management", "practical training for AI course: managing documents with AI", "AI training for operational teams", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for document management", "how to introduce document management into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "document management is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to document management absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for document management." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on document management, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for document management." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether document management deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns document management, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "ai-literacy", "secure-ai-at-work", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-documenti.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-documenti.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-documenti-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-documenti.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-marketing", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "intro", "familyLabel": "Introductory", "featured": false, "title": "AI course: AI-driven marketing and communication", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to marketing and communication, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to marketing and communication, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "8 hours, customisable", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "all", "profileDescription": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach marketing and communication through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on marketing and communication and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on marketing and communication and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Work context", "description": "Documents, channels, tasks and recurring decisions." }, { "title": "Practical AI use", "description": "Instructions, examples, review criteria and limits." }, { "title": "Reusable workflow", "description": "Templates, checklists, handoffs and controls." }, { "title": "Safe adoption", "description": "Data, privacy, quality and next steps." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to marketing and communication.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for marketing and communication.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for marketing and communication.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on marketing and communication", "practical training for AI course: AI-driven marketing and communication", "AI training for operational teams", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for marketing and communication", "how to introduce marketing and communication into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "marketing and communication is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to marketing and communication absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for marketing and communication." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on marketing and communication, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for marketing and communication." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether marketing and communication deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns marketing and communication, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "ai-literacy", "secure-ai-at-work", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-marketing.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-marketing.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-marketing-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-marketing.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-vendite", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "intro", "familyLabel": "Introductory", "featured": false, "title": "AI course: B2C and B2B sales with AI", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to B2B and B2C sales, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to B2B and B2C sales, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "8 hours, customisable", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "all", "profileDescription": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach B2B and B2C sales through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on B2B and B2C sales and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on B2B and B2C sales and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Work context", "description": "Documents, channels, tasks and recurring decisions." }, { "title": "Practical AI use", "description": "Instructions, examples, review criteria and limits." }, { "title": "Reusable workflow", "description": "Templates, checklists, handoffs and controls." }, { "title": "Safe adoption", "description": "Data, privacy, quality and next steps." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to B2B and B2C sales.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for B2B and B2C sales.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for B2B and B2C sales.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on B2B and B2C sales", "practical training for AI course: B2C and B2B sales with AI", "AI training for operational teams", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for B2B and B2C sales", "how to introduce B2B and B2C sales into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "B2B and B2C sales is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to B2B and B2C sales absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for B2B and B2C sales." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on B2B and B2C sales, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for B2B and B2C sales." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether B2B and B2C sales deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns B2B and B2C sales, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "ai-literacy", "secure-ai-at-work", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-vendite.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-vendite.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-vendite-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-vendite.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-admin-finance", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "operational", "familyLabel": "Operational", "featured": false, "title": "AI for administration and management control", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to finance and management control, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to finance and management control, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4-6 hours, customisable", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "mixed", "profileDescription": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach finance and management control through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on finance and management control and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on finance and management control and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Process map", "description": "Recurring work, documents, decisions, exceptions and handoffs." }, { "title": "AI-assisted outputs", "description": "Summaries, classifications, draft responses, reports and checklists." }, { "title": "Workflow controls", "description": "Review, escalation, traceability and responsibility." }, { "title": "Operational adoption", "description": "Metrics, materials, routines and governance." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to finance and management control.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for finance and management control.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for finance and management control.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on finance and management control", "practical training for AI for administration and management control", "AI training for business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for finance and management control", "how to introduce finance and management control into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "finance and management control is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to finance and management control absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for finance and management control." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on finance and management control, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for finance and management control." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether finance and management control deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns finance and management control, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "managing-ai-general", "ai-governance", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-admin-finance.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-admin-finance.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-admin-finance-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-admin-finance.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-operations", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "operational", "familyLabel": "Operational", "featured": false, "title": "AI Operations", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to operations and process coordination, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to operations and process coordination, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4 hours, two 2-hour sessions", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "mixed", "profileDescription": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach operations and process coordination through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on operations and process coordination and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on operations and process coordination and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Process map", "description": "Recurring work, documents, decisions, exceptions and handoffs." }, { "title": "AI-assisted outputs", "description": "Summaries, classifications, draft responses, reports and checklists." }, { "title": "Workflow controls", "description": "Review, escalation, traceability and responsibility." }, { "title": "Operational adoption", "description": "Metrics, materials, routines and governance." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to operations and process coordination.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for operations and process coordination.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for operations and process coordination.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on operations and process coordination", "practical training for AI Operations", "AI training for business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for operations and process coordination", "how to introduce operations and process coordination into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "operations and process coordination is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to operations and process coordination absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for operations and process coordination." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on operations and process coordination, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for operations and process coordination." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether operations and process coordination deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns operations and process coordination, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "managing-ai-general", "ai-governance", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-operations.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-operations.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-operations-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-operations.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-legal-ops", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "operational", "familyLabel": "Operational", "featured": false, "title": "AI Legal Ops and compliance documentation", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to legal operations and compliance documents, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to legal operations and compliance documents, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4-6 hours, customisable", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "mixed", "profileDescription": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach legal operations and compliance documents through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on legal operations and compliance documents and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on legal operations and compliance documents and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Process map", "description": "Recurring work, documents, decisions, exceptions and handoffs." }, { "title": "AI-assisted outputs", "description": "Summaries, classifications, draft responses, reports and checklists." }, { "title": "Workflow controls", "description": "Review, escalation, traceability and responsibility." }, { "title": "Operational adoption", "description": "Metrics, materials, routines and governance." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to legal operations and compliance documents.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for legal operations and compliance documents.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for legal operations and compliance documents.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on legal operations and compliance documents", "practical training for AI Legal Ops and compliance documentation", "AI training for business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for legal operations and compliance documents", "how to introduce legal operations and compliance documents into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "legal operations and compliance documents is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to legal operations and compliance documents absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for legal operations and compliance documents." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on legal operations and compliance documents, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for legal operations and compliance documents." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether legal operations and compliance documents deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns legal operations and compliance documents, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "managing-ai-general", "ai-governance", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-legal-ops.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-legal-ops.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-legal-ops-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-legal-ops.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-procurement", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "operational", "familyLabel": "Operational", "featured": false, "title": "AI for procurement and supplier intelligence", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to procurement and supplier intelligence, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to procurement and supplier intelligence, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4-6 hours, customisable", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "mixed", "profileDescription": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach procurement and supplier intelligence through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on procurement and supplier intelligence and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on procurement and supplier intelligence and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Process map", "description": "Recurring work, documents, decisions, exceptions and handoffs." }, { "title": "AI-assisted outputs", "description": "Summaries, classifications, draft responses, reports and checklists." }, { "title": "Workflow controls", "description": "Review, escalation, traceability and responsibility." }, { "title": "Operational adoption", "description": "Metrics, materials, routines and governance." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to procurement and supplier intelligence.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for procurement and supplier intelligence.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for procurement and supplier intelligence.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on procurement and supplier intelligence", "practical training for AI for procurement and supplier intelligence", "AI training for business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for procurement and supplier intelligence", "how to introduce procurement and supplier intelligence into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "procurement and supplier intelligence is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to procurement and supplier intelligence absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for procurement and supplier intelligence." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on procurement and supplier intelligence, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for procurement and supplier intelligence." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether procurement and supplier intelligence deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns procurement and supplier intelligence, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "managing-ai-general", "ai-governance", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-procurement.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-procurement.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-procurement-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-procurement.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-customer-service", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "operational", "familyLabel": "Operational", "featured": false, "title": "AI for customer service and ticket triage", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to customer service and ticket triage, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to customer service and ticket triage, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4-6 hours, customisable", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "mixed", "profileDescription": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach customer service and ticket triage through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on customer service and ticket triage and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on customer service and ticket triage and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Process map", "description": "Recurring work, documents, decisions, exceptions and handoffs." }, { "title": "AI-assisted outputs", "description": "Summaries, classifications, draft responses, reports and checklists." }, { "title": "Workflow controls", "description": "Review, escalation, traceability and responsibility." }, { "title": "Operational adoption", "description": "Metrics, materials, routines and governance." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to customer service and ticket triage.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for customer service and ticket triage.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for customer service and ticket triage.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on customer service and ticket triage", "practical training for AI for customer service and ticket triage", "AI training for business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for customer service and ticket triage", "how to introduce customer service and ticket triage into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "customer service and ticket triage is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to customer service and ticket triage absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for customer service and ticket triage." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on customer service and ticket triage, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for customer service and ticket triage." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether customer service and ticket triage deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns customer service and ticket triage, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "managing-ai-general", "ai-governance", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-customer-service.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-customer-service.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-customer-service-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-customer-service.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-quality-management", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "operational", "familyLabel": "Operational", "featured": false, "title": "AI for quality and non-conformities", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to quality and non-conformities, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to quality and non-conformities, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4-6 hours, customisable", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "mixed", "profileDescription": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach quality and non-conformities through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on quality and non-conformities and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on quality and non-conformities and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Process map", "description": "Recurring work, documents, decisions, exceptions and handoffs." }, { "title": "AI-assisted outputs", "description": "Summaries, classifications, draft responses, reports and checklists." }, { "title": "Workflow controls", "description": "Review, escalation, traceability and responsibility." }, { "title": "Operational adoption", "description": "Metrics, materials, routines and governance." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to quality and non-conformities.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for quality and non-conformities.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for quality and non-conformities.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on quality and non-conformities", "practical training for AI for quality and non-conformities", "AI training for business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for quality and non-conformities", "how to introduce quality and non-conformities into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "quality and non-conformities is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to quality and non-conformities absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for quality and non-conformities." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on quality and non-conformities, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for quality and non-conformities." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether quality and non-conformities deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns quality and non-conformities, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "managing-ai-general", "ai-governance", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-quality-management.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-quality-management.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-quality-management-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-quality-management.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-people-ops", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "operational", "familyLabel": "Operational", "featured": false, "title": "AI People Ops", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to People Ops and HR workflows, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to People Ops and HR workflows, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4-6 hours, customisable", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "mixed", "profileDescription": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach People Ops and HR workflows through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on People Ops and HR workflows and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on People Ops and HR workflows and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Process map", "description": "Recurring work, documents, decisions, exceptions and handoffs." }, { "title": "AI-assisted outputs", "description": "Summaries, classifications, draft responses, reports and checklists." }, { "title": "Workflow controls", "description": "Review, escalation, traceability and responsibility." }, { "title": "Operational adoption", "description": "Metrics, materials, routines and governance." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to People Ops and HR workflows.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for People Ops and HR workflows.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for People Ops and HR workflows.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on People Ops and HR workflows", "practical training for AI People Ops", "AI training for business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for People Ops and HR workflows", "how to introduce People Ops and HR workflows into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "People Ops and HR workflows is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to People Ops and HR workflows absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for People Ops and HR workflows." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on People Ops and HR workflows, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for People Ops and HR workflows." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether People Ops and HR workflows deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns People Ops and HR workflows, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "managing-ai-general", "ai-governance", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-people-ops.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-people-ops.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-people-ops-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-people-ops.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-brand-voice", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "operational", "familyLabel": "Operational", "featured": false, "title": "AI Brand Voice and communication", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to brand voice and communication, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to brand voice and communication, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4 hours, two 2-hour sessions", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "mixed", "profileDescription": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach brand voice and communication through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For managers and non-technical teams; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on brand voice and communication and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on brand voice and communication and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Process map", "description": "Recurring work, documents, decisions, exceptions and handoffs." }, { "title": "AI-assisted outputs", "description": "Summaries, classifications, draft responses, reports and checklists." }, { "title": "Workflow controls", "description": "Review, escalation, traceability and responsibility." }, { "title": "Operational adoption", "description": "Metrics, materials, routines and governance." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to brand voice and communication.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for brand voice and communication.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for brand voice and communication.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on brand voice and communication", "practical training for AI Brand Voice and communication", "AI training for business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for brand voice and communication", "how to introduce brand voice and communication into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "brand voice and communication is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to brand voice and communication absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for brand voice and communication." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on brand voice and communication, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for brand voice and communication." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether brand voice and communication deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns brand voice and communication, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "managing-ai-general", "ai-governance", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-brand-voice.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-brand-voice.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-brand-voice-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-brand-voice.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "embeddings", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "technical", "familyLabel": "Technical", "featured": false, "title": "Semantic search and AI knowledge bases", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to semantic search and knowledge bases, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to semantic search and knowledge bases, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "60-90 minuti o modulo breve", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "technical", "profileDescription": "For technical teams with programming and software architecture basics.", "problem": "Companies often approach semantic search and knowledge bases through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For technical teams with programming and software architecture basics.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on semantic search and knowledge bases and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on semantic search and knowledge bases and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Architecture and requirements", "description": "Goals, boundaries, data, services and risk assumptions." }, { "title": "Build and integration patterns", "description": "Pipelines, interfaces, context, permissions and testing." }, { "title": "Evaluation and quality", "description": "Metrics, review, regression tests and failure modes." }, { "title": "Production and governance", "description": "Monitoring, security, audit, cost and maintenance." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to semantic search and knowledge bases.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for semantic search and knowledge bases.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "Basic technical familiarity with software, data or system architecture is recommended.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for semantic search and knowledge bases.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on semantic search and knowledge bases", "practical training for Semantic search and AI knowledge bases", "AI training for technical teams", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for semantic search and knowledge bases", "how to introduce semantic search and knowledge bases into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "semantic search and knowledge bases is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to semantic search and knowledge bases absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for semantic search and knowledge bases." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on semantic search and knowledge bases, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for semantic search and knowledge bases." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether semantic search and knowledge bases deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns semantic search and knowledge bases, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "secure-ai-sdlc", "rag-engineering", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/embeddings.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/embeddings.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/embeddings-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/embeddings.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "rag-engineering", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "technical", "familyLabel": "Technical", "featured": false, "title": "RAG Engineering for reliable AI systems", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to RAG engineering, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to RAG engineering, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "5 hours, two 2.5-hour sessions", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "technical", "profileDescription": "For technical teams with programming and software architecture basics.", "problem": "Companies often approach RAG engineering through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For technical teams with programming and software architecture basics.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on RAG engineering and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on RAG engineering and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Architecture and requirements", "description": "Goals, boundaries, data, services and risk assumptions." }, { "title": "Build and integration patterns", "description": "Pipelines, interfaces, context, permissions and testing." }, { "title": "Evaluation and quality", "description": "Metrics, review, regression tests and failure modes." }, { "title": "Production and governance", "description": "Monitoring, security, audit, cost and maintenance." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to RAG engineering.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for RAG engineering.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "Basic technical familiarity with software, data or system architecture is recommended.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for RAG engineering.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on RAG engineering", "practical training for RAG Engineering for reliable AI systems", "AI training for technical teams", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for RAG engineering", "how to introduce RAG engineering into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "RAG engineering is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to RAG engineering absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for RAG engineering." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on RAG engineering, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for RAG engineering." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether RAG engineering deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns RAG engineering, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "secure-ai-sdlc", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/rag-engineering.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/rag-engineering.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/rag-engineering-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/rag-engineering.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-coding-agents", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "technical", "familyLabel": "Technical", "featured": false, "title": "AI Coding Agents for software teams", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to AI coding agents, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to AI coding agents, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4 hours, two 2-hour sessions", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "technical", "profileDescription": "For technical teams with programming and software architecture basics.", "problem": "Companies often approach AI coding agents through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For technical teams with programming and software architecture basics.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on AI coding agents and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on AI coding agents and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Architecture and requirements", "description": "Goals, boundaries, data, services and risk assumptions." }, { "title": "Build and integration patterns", "description": "Pipelines, interfaces, context, permissions and testing." }, { "title": "Evaluation and quality", "description": "Metrics, review, regression tests and failure modes." }, { "title": "Production and governance", "description": "Monitoring, security, audit, cost and maintenance." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to AI coding agents.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for AI coding agents.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "Basic technical familiarity with software, data or system architecture is recommended.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for AI coding agents.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on AI coding agents", "practical training for AI Coding Agents for software teams", "AI training for technical teams", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for AI coding agents", "how to introduce AI coding agents into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "AI coding agents is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to AI coding agents absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for AI coding agents." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on AI coding agents, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for AI coding agents." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether AI coding agents deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns AI coding agents, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "secure-ai-sdlc", "rag-engineering", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-coding-agents.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-coding-agents.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-coding-agents-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-coding-agents.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-software-engineering", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "technical", "familyLabel": "Technical", "featured": false, "title": "AI Software Engineering", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to AI software engineering, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to AI software engineering, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "5 hours, two 2.5-hour sessions", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "technical", "profileDescription": "For technical teams with programming and software architecture basics.", "problem": "Companies often approach AI software engineering through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For technical teams with programming and software architecture basics.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on AI software engineering and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on AI software engineering and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Architecture and requirements", "description": "Goals, boundaries, data, services and risk assumptions." }, { "title": "Build and integration patterns", "description": "Pipelines, interfaces, context, permissions and testing." }, { "title": "Evaluation and quality", "description": "Metrics, review, regression tests and failure modes." }, { "title": "Production and governance", "description": "Monitoring, security, audit, cost and maintenance." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to AI software engineering.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for AI software engineering.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "Basic technical familiarity with software, data or system architecture is recommended.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for AI software engineering.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on AI software engineering", "practical training for AI Software Engineering", "AI training for technical teams", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for AI software engineering", "how to introduce AI software engineering into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "AI software engineering is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to AI software engineering absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for AI software engineering." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on AI software engineering, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for AI software engineering." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether AI software engineering deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns AI software engineering, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "secure-ai-sdlc", "rag-engineering", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-software-engineering.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-software-engineering.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-software-engineering-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-software-engineering.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "secure-ai-sdlc", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "technical", "familyLabel": "Technical", "featured": false, "title": "Secure AI SDLC", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to secure AI software lifecycle, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to secure AI software lifecycle, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4-6 hours, customisable", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "technical", "profileDescription": "For technical teams with programming and software architecture basics.", "problem": "Companies often approach secure AI software lifecycle through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For technical teams with programming and software architecture basics.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on secure AI software lifecycle and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on secure AI software lifecycle and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Architecture and requirements", "description": "Goals, boundaries, data, services and risk assumptions." }, { "title": "Build and integration patterns", "description": "Pipelines, interfaces, context, permissions and testing." }, { "title": "Evaluation and quality", "description": "Metrics, review, regression tests and failure modes." }, { "title": "Production and governance", "description": "Monitoring, security, audit, cost and maintenance." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to secure AI software lifecycle.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for secure AI software lifecycle.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "Basic technical familiarity with software, data or system architecture is recommended.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for secure AI software lifecycle.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on secure AI software lifecycle", "practical training for Secure AI SDLC", "AI training for technical teams", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for secure AI software lifecycle", "how to introduce secure AI software lifecycle into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "secure AI software lifecycle is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to secure AI software lifecycle absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for secure AI software lifecycle." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on secure AI software lifecycle, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for secure AI software lifecycle." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether secure AI software lifecycle deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns secure AI software lifecycle, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "rag-engineering", "ai-output-quality" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/secure-ai-sdlc.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/secure-ai-sdlc.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/secure-ai-sdlc-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/secure-ai-sdlc.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "secure-ai-at-work", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "managerial", "familyLabel": "Managerial", "featured": false, "title": "Secure AI at Work", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to secure AI use at work, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to secure AI use at work, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4 hours, adaptable by function", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "all", "profileDescription": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach secure AI use at work through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on secure AI use at work and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on secure AI use at work and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Shared understanding", "description": "Capabilities, limits, responsibilities and business implications." }, { "title": "Use-case evaluation", "description": "Value, feasibility, risk, data and ownership." }, { "title": "Governance and quality", "description": "Rules, review, escalation and accountable decisions." }, { "title": "Adoption roadmap", "description": "Priorities, skills, metrics and next steps." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to secure AI use at work.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for secure AI use at work.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for secure AI use at work.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on secure AI use at work", "practical training for Secure AI at Work", "AI training for managers and business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for secure AI use at work", "how to introduce secure AI use at work into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "secure AI use at work is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to secure AI use at work absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for secure AI use at work." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on secure AI use at work, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for secure AI use at work." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether secure AI use at work deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns secure AI use at work, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "ai-governance", "ai-adoption-manager", "ai-business-case-roi" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/secure-ai-at-work.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/secure-ai-at-work.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/secure-ai-at-work-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/secure-ai-at-work.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } }, { "id": "ai-output-quality", "locale": "en", "language": "en", "family": "managerial", "familyLabel": "Managerial", "featured": false, "title": "AI Output Quality & Human Review", "subtitle": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to AI output quality and human review, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "summary": "Practical corporate course for applying AI to AI output quality and human review, with exercises on realistic work, reusable materials and clear governance criteria.", "duration": "4-6 hours, customisable", "mode": "In-person or online lab, with guided exercises and materials adapted to the client.", "profile": "all", "profileDescription": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "problem": "Companies often approach AI output quality and human review through scattered experiments: a few prompts, a few enthusiastic users, many doubts about data, quality and responsibility. This course turns that uncertainty into an operating method. Participants work on realistic scenarios, learn where AI helps, where human review remains essential and how to make the practice repeatable inside the company.", "audience": "For company teams, operational functions and managers; no programming required.", "whenToChoose": "Choose this course when the company wants concrete progress on AI output quality and human review and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "chooseIf": "When the company wants concrete progress on AI output quality and human review and needs training that produces usable workflows, not abstract theory.", "outcomes": [ "Map the work and the decisions where AI can reduce friction.", "Build practical instructions, checklists and review criteria.", "Identify data, privacy and responsibility boundaries.", "Create reusable examples for the team.", "Define next steps for adoption and governance." ], "modules": [ { "title": "Shared understanding", "description": "Capabilities, limits, responsibilities and business implications." }, { "title": "Use-case evaluation", "description": "Value, feasibility, risk, data and ownership." }, { "title": "Governance and quality", "description": "Rules, review, escalation and accountable decisions." }, { "title": "Adoption roadmap", "description": "Priorities, skills, metrics and next steps." } ], "exercises": [ "Map a realistic process connected to AI output quality and human review.", "Create AI-assisted outputs and review them critically.", "Define escalation and human review points.", "Build a reusable checklist for daily work." ], "materials": [ "Operating canvas for AI output quality and human review.", "Prompt and instruction templates.", "Quality and privacy checklist.", "Risk/control matrix.", "Adoption notes for the team." ], "privacy": "The course uses synthetic, public, anonymised or client-approved materials. It explains how to minimise data exposure, protect confidential information, verify outputs and keep human responsibility explicit.", "prerequisites": "No programming required. Familiarity with the business process is useful.", "faqs": [ { "question": "Is the course tool-specific?", "answer": "No. Patterns and workflows are adapted to the tools and policies chosen with the client." }, { "question": "Can company data be used?", "answer": "Only when accounts, contracts and internal policies allow it. Otherwise synthetic or anonymised data is used." }, { "question": "What remains after the course?", "answer": "Reusable materials, examples, checklists and a clear set of next steps." }, { "question": "Is it theoretical?", "answer": "No. The course is built around practical exercises and decisions close to real work." } ], "output": "Operating canvas for AI output quality and human review.", "searchIntents": [ "corporate AI course on AI output quality and human review", "practical training for AI Output Quality & Human Review", "AI training for managers and business functions", "Artik Lab path for Operating canvas for AI output quality and human review", "how to introduce AI output quality and human review into company workflows" ], "needSignals": [ "AI output quality and human review is already discussed internally, but there is no shared method for turning it into practice.", "People experiment with AI tools on their own and the company does not yet see comparable criteria, controls and outcomes.", "The process connected to AI output quality and human review absorbs time, creates manual handoffs or produces outputs that are hard to verify.", "Leadership needs to decide whether to invest, train or stop before introducing fragile automation.", "The company needs a concrete training outcome: Operating canvas for AI output quality and human review." ], "extraExamples": [ { "title": "From generic training to the real process", "description": "A company asks for training on AI output quality and human review, but the real issue emerges during mapping: repeated tasks, informal checks and distributed responsibilities. The path uses examples close to daily work and turns training into an initial operating model, not a theory session." }, { "title": "From individual experimentation to governed practice", "description": "Some people have already found shortcuts with AI while others are blocked. The course creates a shared base: what can be done, what must be reviewed, which data should not be exposed and when escalation is needed. The result is Operating canvas for AI output quality and human review." }, { "title": "From enthusiasm to decision", "description": "Management needs to understand whether AI output quality and human review deserves budget and continuity. The lab separates immediate benefits, operational risks and data dependencies. The company leaves with criteria for the next step instead of more isolated demos." } ], "selectionCriteria": [ "Choose this course if the main need concerns AI output quality and human review, not a generic overview of AI.", "Prefer it when there is a process, document, workflow or responsibility to work on during training.", "Postpone it if there is no internal sponsor yet or if the issue is only buying a software licence.", "Pair it with AI Workflow Redesign Lab when the company first needs to understand which processes deserve priority." ], "limits": [ "It does not promise full automation or replacement of human responsibility.", "It does not require confidential data to be uploaded into unapproved environments.", "It is not legal, tax, HR or specialist technical advice when those responsibilities remain with competent functions.", "It produces skills, criteria and reusable materials; continued adoption requires sponsorship, governance and internal practice." ], "relatedCourseIds": [ "workflow-redesign", "ai-governance", "ai-adoption-manager", "ai-business-case-roi" ], "urls": { "html": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-output-quality.html", "markdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-output-quality.md", "dossier": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-output-quality-dossier.md", "json": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/ai-output-quality.json", "catalog": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/", "catalogMarkdown": "https://ar-tik.com/en/courses/index.md" } } ] }