Executive Summary
Main result, recommended decision, value at stake, limits and actions for the next 30, 90 or 180 days.
Beyond the dashboard
Agentic data analysis does not produce charts to archive: it finds signals in already available data, connects them to a decision and states where the model is not worth building.
Data analysis
It is a service that verifies where company data can reduce delays, waste, errors or risk. If the signal is missing, the useful outcome is knowing which project not to fund.
Beyond the dashboard
Main result, recommended decision, value at stake, limits and actions for the next 30, 90 or 180 days.
Data used, controls, methods, metrics, reproducibility and evidence that the model beats a minimum benchmark.
Low-risk pilot, responsibilities, timing, measures to observe and criteria to extend, change or stop.
Which data to collect next, why, with what priority and which decision it would strengthen.
Customers, orders, lots or bookings that can be saved before value is lost.
Predictive projects not to fund when current data does not contain the needed signal.
Resources reallocated to time slots, products, checks or processes that truly matter.
More credible deliveries, availability, timing and communication based on better estimates.
Less generic data collection, more closely tied to concrete decisions.
AI atlas
Many projects start from data, but value may live in documents, emails, procedures, technical software, governance or training. The Atlas helps recognise the right area before shaping the first project.
Explore the Atlas Choose the first stepHow to choose the first project
Agentic data analysis
Each story explains the business problem, which operating data enters the analysis, which signal emerges and which decision can be supported. These are not standard promises; they show how public, anonymised or realistic datasets, without recognisable client projects, can become verifiable action.
A hotel can read risk at booking time: on more than 119,000 bookings, the system catches more than eight cancellations out of ten.
The story is simple: management usually sees cancellations when the loss has already happened. Agentic data analysis looks earlier, using signals already present before the stay, such as lead time, payment terms and customer history.
For a hotel, residence or hospitality group, booking-engine data becomes a commercial priority list. Fragile bookings can be confirmed, contacted or managed with different conditions.
When the kitchen does not confirm the order as ready, the risk of losing it rises to 35.7%.
At first the problem looks like final delivery: an order does not arrive, the customer complains, the restaurant loses trust. The analysis shows that the signal appears earlier, inside the kitchen workflow.
For a delivery platform or restaurant chain, the question changes: not “which rider is late?”, but “which order is leaving the process before it can be delivered?”.
Average delivery-time error moves from about 41 minutes to about 17 minutes.
For urban logistics companies, the issue is not only delivering faster. It is promising a realistic arrival time, so customers wait less, support receives fewer calls and fleet coordination improves.
The analysis starts from orders and historical timing, but does not stop at the average. It finds recurring conditions that make a delivery slower or faster and turns them into a more useful forecast.
The forecast reduces error by 77% against the reference rule.
An energy operator or large consumer must decide in advance how much energy to buy, hedge or reserve. If the forecast is too cautious, resources are locked up; if it is too low, the company faces correction costs.
The analysis reads hourly consumption history and builds an expected profile for the next day. The output is not a chart to archive, but decision support for energy planning.
Revenue forecasting improves by 24% versus the “same as last week” rule.
A restaurant decides every week how much fresh stock to buy and how many people to schedule. If the decision is based only on intuition, weak days create waste and strong days create service pressure.
The analysis starts from revenue history and recognises the real rhythm of the venue. The forecast becomes a practical tool for kitchen, dining room and purchasing before demand arrives.
The riskiest lots waste almost three times as much as the safest ones.
In a supermarket or food supply chain, waste does not appear all at once. It starts with small signals: packaging, handling, cold chain, arrival timing and sales priority.
The analysis reads these signals when a lot enters the process and creates a risk ranking. The point is not to predict every loss, but to decide which lots to check, rotate or discount early.
The system recognises about three at-risk customers out of four.
A bank can notice a customer leaving when the account is already lost, or it can read earlier signs that the relationship is cooling. The analysis separates generic risk from the commercial lever that can be acted on.
The useful story is not “this customer will leave”, but “this customer shows inactivity signals and can be reactivated with a targeted action”. That difference matters when building credible campaigns.
A few dayparts and a few menu items generate almost three quarters of revenue.
In a quick service chain, the problem is not only selling more. It is understanding where revenue really comes from: which time slots need staff, which products deserve stock, which items occupy space without carrying weight.
Descriptive analysis becomes an operating story: the menu is not all equal and the day does not weigh all the same. This helps decide shifts, stock and promotions with less impression and more evidence.
With lab data, the system recognises 87% of high-tier lots.
A winery already collects chemical measures during production. Often those data remain technical, separated from commercial choices and lot destination decisions.
The analysis shows that these signals can help identify premium-potential lots early. It does not replace the winemaker’s judgement; it helps protect value before blending decisions disperse it.
With available sensors, the analysis recognises about 84% of observed failures.
In a factory, a failure is not only a technical event: it stops people, orders and production capacity. Many machines already have sensors, but signals remain scattered or are read too late.
The analysis creates a warning when machine behaviour resembles failure situations already seen. It is useful when it immediately triggers a work order, inspection or field check.
In catalogue data, the best variable explains less than 2% of returns.
A fashion e-commerce business may want to predict which items will be returned. The temptation is to use convenient data: category, price, colour and product page information.
The analysis shows that those data are not enough. This is a good managerial finding: it avoids a fragile investment and points to the information that matters, such as fit, customer history and return reason.
With planning data only, the best model remains close to a random choice.
A logistics operator wants to know before departure which deliveries will be late. But if it uses only planning data, it is looking at an incomplete picture: the events that happen during the trip are missing.
The analysis avoids forcing a weak forecast. The better decision is to collect travel events, stops, unloading, weather and operating anomalies before building a more ambitious model.
With the same number of checks, the ranking catches more severe cases.
A control body or compliance function always has more cases to check than it can handle immediately. The question is not to run infinite checks, but to choose the right order.
The analysis uses inspection history to build a priority list. Checks remain human, but the agenda is ordered to increase the chance of finding the most serious cases first.
Operating profiles show an 11.4-point efficiency gap.
In production, average consumption often hides different stories. The same machine can work in more or less efficient ways, but raw energy data does not immediately explain why.
The analysis groups machine behaviours and shows which profiles deserve comparison. Before buying new sensors or equipment, the company can ask which operating conditions separate efficient work from waste.
Frequently asked questions
No. BI monitors known indicators; agentic analysis diagnoses causes, searches for hidden signals and connects results to decisions.
No. The first value can be verifying whether existing data is fit for purpose, what its limits are and which data to collect next.
The method states the negative verdict and indicates which investment to avoid or which data collection to start before funding a model.
Contact
The first 30-45 minute call clarifies the decision, available data, constraints and possible action before funding a model or collecting new data.
Email dtr@ar-tik.com